Category Archives: Uncategorized

Ichabod’s mother: there is no glory

Preface

The servant stood poised with the three-pronged hook, watching the boiling water turn the Israelite’s animal sacrifice from blood-red to brownish gray. No longer content with their rightful portion (Deut. 18:1-3), the debauched priests, Hophne and Phinehas, Eli’s sons, wanted all the meat that could be speared from the cooking pot. Not only that, before the fat was burned (1 Samuel 2:16), they demanded raw meat for roasting—going against sacrificial law. Any objections were met with force. Israel was all too familiar with the actions of these sons of Belial who grew fat with the best of all the offerings of Israel while their father looked on (1 Samuel 2:29).

Compounding their offenses,  the brothers flaunted their wantonness by openly sleeping  with women who assembled at the tabernacle of meeting (1 Samuel 2:22).  Eli knew such wicked impudence toward the LORD and His offerings would have serious consequences—for them and for Israel. How could he help but remember when God warned him through Samuel about his vile sons (3:11-14)? Surely the prophecy of the man of God was etched into his memory, and that stinging indictment for honoring his sons more than God Himself.

He pleaded with them. “Why do you do such things? For I hear of your evil dealing from all the people. It is not a good report that I hear. You make the LORD’s people transgress” (1 Samuel 2: 23-24).   His words fell on deaf ears, and ultimately, they would all pay with their lives.

***

Trouble for Israel

The battle was intense and bloody, and now Israelite bodies—thousands of them—lay strewn on the battlefield. The Philistines claimed victory, no doubt celebrating long into the night at Aphek.

How could this have happened? When word reached the camp at Ebenezer, the elders could only ask, “Why has the LORD defeated us today before the Philistines?”

It was obvious that the LORD’s blessing was missing. The only thing to do was to send to Shiloh for the ark of the covenant of the LORD of hosts, which they did; and it arrived at the camp along with the reprobates, Hophne and Phinehas.

Heartened by the sight of their cherished ark, the Israelite camp erupted into shouts of celebration. Philistine confidence changed to terror at the thought that suddenly Israel’s God was there—the One who sent horrible plagues against Egypt. Officers quickly rallied their troops, shouting, “Be strong and conduct yourselves like men, you Philistines, that you do not become servants of the Hebrews, as they have been to you. Conduct yourselves like men, and fight!” (1 Samuel 4:9.)

Obedient soldiers rushed into the fray. When it was finally over, the Philistines had prevailed once more. Eli’s sons lay among the casualties. A triumphant army returned to Ashdod bringing with it a treasure beyond belief—Israel’s sacred ark of the covenant.

The Ark of the Covenant

The Ark of the Covenant (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

No good news

Eli, ninety-eight years old, heavy, and nearly blind, sat by the wayside near Shiloh, trembling with apprehension. The ark had left the city—his wicked sons had gone with it. Now he could only wait. Would it return? Were the prophecies already coming to pass?

His failing eyes probably could not make out the survivor who finally straggled into Shiloh with the sorry report, but his ears told the story. Unmistakable cries of distress filled the air, and the messenger himself confirmed Eli’s worst fears: the ark of the covenant—captured by the Philistines, and his two sons, dead. Recoiling in shock, Israel’s judge of forty years toppled backward off his seat and died of a broken neck.

One more casualty

At the same time, Phinehas’ wife went into labor, perhaps precipitated by the dreadful news. The ark had been captured! Her husband and Eli, dead! With one last push, her strength was spent. The midwives tried to revive her with the news of a baby boy, but all she could think about was the ark and her loss. She managed to name her baby Ichabod (which means there is no glory), and with her dying words she said, “The glory has departed from Israel, for the ark of God has been captured” (1 Samuel 4:22).

What we do and do not know

Ichabod’s mother is anonymous. She gets four verses in the Bible. By piecing together other scriptures we know that she was married to a priest who was unfaithful to God and unfaithful to her. She lived during one of the lowest points in the history of the nation of Israel. There is no other record of her in the Bible. While it seems likely Eli had given up on his rebellious sons (even though he shared in their guilt), we have no indication of her thoughts regarding her husband, Phinehas. Was she privy to Samuel’s warning message, or the ominous prophecy of the man of God regarding  her family’s future? The Bible gives no indication.

What we do have is evidence of her dying concern for the fate of Israel and for the ark of God. If only we could know more.

(For the complete account, please read 1 Samuel 1-4.)

Of a mother and her child

The Creator definitely had a master plan when He put all the elements needed for growth and success in place. He created two beings—a man and a woman, each made in His image—and told them to become one, and to multiply. He gave them guidelines for happiness, a beautiful place in which to live, and the ability to produce offspring, also in their own image.

The miracle of reproduction is still amazing these thousands of years later. The fact that an infant is not only born with its parents’ likenesses, but that its mother can continue to sustain it with life-giving nourishment from her own body is awesome. From its very first cry, she is there to hold her baby close, to suckle it, and establish a bond meant to last a lifetime.

Janis Rozentals - Mother and Child

Janis Rozentals – Mother and Child (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The mother who laughed

The first reference in the Bible to nursing is in Genesis 21:6-7, when Sarah rejoiced at the birth of her miracle-son, Isaac:  “And Sarah said, ‘God has made me laugh, and all who hear will laugh with me.’ She also said, ‘Who would have said to Abraham that Sarah would nurse children? For I have borne him a son in his old age.”

Treacherous times

The next episode of note involves the birth of a beautiful baby boy during treacherous times. Moses, Jochebed and Amram’s third child, was born under a death sentence. Pharaoh’s maniacal efforts to curb the growing numbers of Israelites resulted in a chilling edict: All newborn baby boys must be thrown in the river and drowned!

It is possible Jochebed delivered Moses without the aid of midwives in the interest of secrecy; for three months she succeeded in hiding him. No doubt worried about informers or the risk of discovery by palace troops, she embarked on a courageous plan to save her precious boy.

Taking an ark of bulrushes, she waterproofed it with a coating of asphalt and pitch. Then she secreted it among water plants fringing the river’s shore. How heartbreaking it must have been to nurse her tiny son one last time, place him securely in his miniature vessel, and then walk away!

Would he stay safe, and warm, and dry? His sister stood a silent sentinel, watching from afar.

It could not have been long before Pharaoh’s daughter heard cries of a tiny infant as she neared the water. When she discovered Moses she immediately called for a nurse. The Hebrew phrase is literally “a woman causing to be breastfed” (‘ishah meyneqet); some translations have “a wet-nurse.” Miriam was there to suggest just such a person—his own mother, Jochebed.

Lent to the Lord


Another incident concerns a certain woman named Hannah. Hers is a well-known story. Unable to bear children for years, Hannah begged God to hear her pleas, promising that if He should grant her desire for a son, she would give him back to His service. God heard, and Samuel was born. Scripture says, “…The woman stayed and nursed her son until she had weaned him” (1 Samuel 1:23). Then she took him to the house of Lord along with sacrifices, saying,  “For this child I prayed, and the LORD has granted me my petition which I asked of Him. Therefore I also have lent him to the LORD; as long as he lives he shall be lent to the LORD” (vs 27-28).

Weaning

While suckling an infant promotes early bonding, there comes a point when it is no longer possible or practical to do so. The child is weaned, and depends predominantly on other forms of nourishment.

There is some discussion about the age when weaning took place. Burton Scott Easton, in his explanation in The International Bible Standard Encyclopedia, remarks that the Hebrew word for “wean,” gamal, “covers the whole period of nursing and care until the weaning is complete (1 Kings 11:20). This period in ancient Israel extended to about 3 years, and when it was finished the child was mature enough to be intrusted [sic] to strangers (1 Sam 1:24).” He continues that the “completion of the period marked the end of the most critical stage of the child’s life, [and] it was celebrated with a feast (Gen 21:8), a custom still observed in the Orient” (from International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia, Electronic Database Copyright © 1996, 2003 by Biblesoft, Inc.).

On the other hand, Adam Clarke in his commentary on Genesis 21:8 presents different opinions: “The time that children were weaned among the ancients is a disputed point. Jerome says there were two opinions on this subject. Some hold that children were always weaned at five years of age; others, that they were not weaned till they were twelve” (from Adam Clarke’s Commentary, Electronic Database. Copyright © 1996, 2003 by Biblesoft, Inc.). The practicality of either of these ages can easily be disputed.

Conventional wisdom seems satisfied that the age for weaning was between two and three years of age, when a child could walk and chew solid food.

The Jamieson, Fausset and Brown Bible Commentary furnishes the following regarding the celebration when Isaac was weaned (Genesis 21:8): “In Eastern countries this is always a season of domestic festivity, and the newly weaned child is formally brought, in presence of the assembled relatives and friends, to partake of some simple viands. Isaac, attired in the symbolic robe, the badge of birthright, was then admitted heir of the tribe [Rosenmuller].”

Wet nurses and nursemaids

When Moses was rescued by Pharoah’s daughter, the fact that she called for a nursing woman indicates such services were available should the need arise. Sometimes these women would stay on past the weaning stage, and become a nursemaid or, more modernly, a nanny, to the developing child.

Jochebed may have continued with Moses for some time before bringing him to the Egyptian princess—likely due to a grander plan of a higher power at work. It would not be out of the realm of possibility, in my opinion, that she began teaching him about his heritage as well as simply caring for his physical needs in those formative years. However, the Bible does not directly say.

In New Testament times

Among the Roman elite, it was not uncommon for a new mother to rely on the services of a lactating slave or a professional wet nurse. However a certain respect and symbolism existed for the mother who suckled her own young. Lynn H. Cohick, in her book Women in the World of the Earliest Christians (2009), writes, “Reflecting commonly held sentiments, Favorinus (ca. AD 85-165) attacks matrons who refuse to nurse their own infants as consumed by concerns for beauty” (p 145). She continues, “Plutarch, writing from the early second century AD, laments the emotional distance between mother and infant resulting from employing a wet nurse” (p 146).

To this day

Whether or not to nurse one’s baby when it is physically possible continues to be a controversial subject. Although wet nurses are still common in some parts of the developing world, scientific and nutritional advances have provided much of the world with additional means for proper nourishment for infants. There is however a rigorous movement advocating breastfeeding. The only thing missing, at least in this country, is the grand celebration when a child is finally weaned.

A Mother’s Advice

Who was King Lemuel mentioned in Proverbs? Was he King Muel who ruled the mysterious land of Massa? Was he a Chaldean prince from an ancient country? Jewish and Christian commentators “consent” to the probability that Solomon is the king addressed in Proverbs 31:1-9,[1] and that his mother affectionately called him Lemuel.

The name “Lemuel” means devoted to God. When Solomon was an infant, God sent a prophet to give him the name of “Jedidiah” which means beloved of the Lord. Some posit that this “name, spoken by the prophet of the Lord, was the final symbol of God’s forgiveness in the lives of David and Bathsheba.”[2] That Bathsheba cherished this God-given name and considered her son endeared to Him strengthens the general belief that Solomon is Lemuel.

In her position as Solomon’s mother, Bathsheba served as an intercessor and advisor to him. In contrast to the wife of a king who held “a position of comparatively little importance,” the queen mother “commanded great influence.” [3] Women who had the highest authority during the Judean monarchy were the mothers of kings. The queen mother had a fixed position in the king’s administration, but the influence of a wife /concubine depended on many factors: the king’s favor, whether the woman was of royal birth, whether she bore the king’s first child, or whether she gave birth to the heir to the throne. When the king took another woman, it shuffled the pecking order in the harem, but it did not disturb the control of the queen mother.

The Hebrew word gebhirah means the “mistress” or “queen mother.” It refers to a woman with a “sanctioned position within the Judean court and [who] had such great influence upon her son that she too receives blame as part of the monarchy for the fall of Judah.” The books of 1 and 2 Kings and 2 Chronicles include the names of the mothers of the kings of Judah because they were part of the success or failure of the kingship.

The Anointing of Solomon by Cornelis de Vos. A...

The Anointing of Solomon by Cornelis de Vos. According to 1 Kings 1:39, Solomon was anointed by Zadok. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

As queen mother, Bathsheba felt a measure of responsibility for her son’s conduct. Drawing on her understanding of Solomon’s character and the demands of ruling, she advised him on how to be a good king. An example is this is found in Proverbs 31:1-9 (paraphrase mine):

Don’t fritter away your strength on pursuing women, sexual gratification, and political alliances through marriage. Such behavior destroys kings and their kingdoms.

 Avoid excessive use of alcohol. Its effects are mind-altering. It leaves one unable to remember the law and how to make just decisions.

 Stand up for the weak and helpless. Be compassionate and stay in touch with reality.

 His respect

The last recorded conversation between Bathsheba and Solomon is a discussion on the topic of David’s attendant Abishag.  Based on this example of how mother and son interacted, I believe Solomon customarily listened to her with respect. “Bathsheba therefore went to King Solomon…and the king rose up to meet her and bowed down to her, and sat down on his throne and had a throne set for the king’s mother; so she sat at his right hand. Then she said, ‘I desire one small petition of you; do not refuse me’” (1 Kings 2:13-21). Although Solomon refused the “one small petition” she asked on this occasion, he accepted Bathsheba’s right to present her case.

It is unlikely that Solomon wholly rejected Bathsheba’s three points on being an honorable king. But in the course of his reign he did not wholly take them to heart, either. On the negative side, he gathered a harem of a thousand women, he gratified himself with wine, and he imposed heavy taxes and forced labor. When Solomon died, the people remembered him for having placed a “heavy yoke” and “burdensome service” on them (1 Kings 12:4).

Advice not taken

Why didn’t Solomon follow his mother’s advice? Maybe he didn’t see the need for it. He was youthful, vigorous and confident. God had given him wisdom, riches and honor. He felt assured of God’s love and favor (1 Kings 3:4-14). He built a magnificent house for God, and God blessed it with His glory.

Maybe Solomon had a different vision for his reign—a generation gap? His father was a man of war and had consolidated the kingdom.  Solomon assumed the throne in peacetime. His goals were made possible by peace.

I set my heart to seek and search out by wisdom concerning all that is done under heaven (Eccl. 1:13).

 I set my heart to know wisdom and to know madness and folly (Eccl. 1:17).

 I searched in my heart how to gratify my flesh with wine, while guiding my heart with wisdom, and how to lay hold on folly, till I might see what was good for the sons of men to do under heaven all the days of their lives (Eccl. 2:3).

Maybe he had already started down a bad path and Bathsheba was correcting him, as some commentators believe. “This exclamation of Lemuel’s mother implies apprehension in respect to the sins against which she warns him if not remonstrance against the present practice of them.”[4]

In the End

After her intercession for David’s son Adonijah, Bathsheba vanishes from scripture (1 Kings 2:13-21). Did she continue advising Solomon? Did she deal with his excesses? Did she encourage him to write? Did she help compile his wise sayings? Did she read that he valued her teaching?

My son, keep your father’s command, and do not forsake the law of your mother. Bind them continually upon your heart; tie them around your neck. When you roam, they will lead you; when you sleep, they will keep you; and when you awake, they will speak with you.

 Was she gratified?—Mary Hendren


[1] An Exposition of the Old and New Testament, John Gill, online note on Prov.31:1

[2] NKJV Study Bible, Second Edition, Thomas Nelson, note on II Samuel 12:25

[3] Hastings Dictionary of the Bible, p.778

[4] The Family Bible Notes, Justin Edwards, note on v. 2, Online Publishing source

Exploring the bond of motherhood

“To the woman He said:
‘I will greatly multiply your sorrow and your conception;
In pain you shall bring forth children;
Your desire shall be for your husband,
And he shall rule over you.’

“And Adam called his wife’s name Eve, because she was the mother of all living” (Gen. 3:16, 20).

These words often bring to mind a scene of the wily serpent beguiling Eve with flattery, whispers, and innuendos, an event that changed the course of mankind. Ministers and laity draw life lessons from her story—from cautions about Satan’s bag of tricks to insights concerning the roles of husbands and wives. Rarely, it seems, does one focus on the phrase “the mother of all living,” or particularly on the word “mother.”

In the broader sense, since Eve was the first woman, and the first one to bear a child, she becomes the original mother for the human race. But tucked into the meaning of the Hebrew word for mother,[1] Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible includes a parenthetical note in its definition: “a mother (as the bond of the family).”

A couple of the nuances of the English word bond could serve to enlarge on Strong’s note. For instance:

  • Adhesion: the way in which one surface sticks to another. Mothers were and are instrumental in making sure knowledge of proper conduct before God and man “sticks” to their children.
  • A link that binds people together in a relationship. Wives model respect for their husbands, which in turn encourages children to respect and honor their father. Mothers spend endless hours ironing out sibling differences on a regular basis.
Motherhood

Motherhood (Photo credit: Wikipedia) While there are many joys associated with motherhood, every mother faces challenges. Some are straightforward: she must provide for the physical needs such as feeding and clothing children. Then there is the task of teaching everything from walking and talking, to safety issues, to life skills. A mother’s job is daunting and demanding!

In this week’s posts, WomenfromtheBook will investigate some maternal duties from a historical perspective. When considering physical needs, breastfeeding was at the top of the list; obviously a child’s survival depended on it. While there are some evidences of primitive baby bottles as early as 2000 BC, birth mothers, or, on occasion, wet nurses provided this vital nourishment. The Bible points us to some interesting cultural insights regarding this type of nurturing.

Teaching children consumed much of a mother’s time during their formative years—whether by rote, or by specific instruction and applications. Mary Hendren recently highlighted the joint activities of a mother and grandmother, Eunice and Lois, with regard to Timothy’s upbringing. This week we look forward to Mary’s insights on the life of Bathsheba and her influence on Solomon.

Finally there are mothers about whom little is known. By blending the dark brushstrokes of their social backdrop, a faint cameo gradually emerges—like Ichabod’s mother, for instance. Remember her? No? After this week, perhaps you will.


[1] See Strong’s Concordance, Mother, ‘em (517)

The last post for the year

Here it is the last day of 2012. It has been an exciting year for Women from the Book Blog. WordPress sent a review of our activity during 2012, and I’d like to share some of the results. They are quite encouraging!

We posted eighty times since our beginning in mid-year, and included twenty-nine pictures. The blog had viewers from 70 countries, for a total of 4700 views. Fifty-eight of you are regular followers. Thank you!

Currently our production team (read, Mary and I) is brainstorming possibilities for 2013. Some topics under consideration are mothers, women from the Book of Proverbs, ancient beauty treatments, sorting out the Marys, and wives. We are discussing the Proverbs 31 woman, with an eye to placing her in her cultural context. Does she picture the wealthy woman of her day, perhaps even royalty or status? Or,  is she presented to be an idealized model for every woman down through time? Perhaps it’s both?

After a short time-out

Our first posts for the new year will start on January 7, 2013. If you have any suggestions for future topics, or how we might improve our blog, please feel free to contact me. Just post in the comments section, or I can give you a private email address upon request.

Thanks for stopping by. May your 2013 be a year filled with discovery. We certainly hope ours will be–especially concerning Women from the Book!

Prov 31 30 1280x800

Prov 31 30 1280×800 (Photo credit: Peej’s Photos)

Early childhood education

She looked at Timothy, opened her eyes expectantly and touched his thumb.

Hear, O Israel…

 She smiled and touched the tip of his first finger.

The LORD is our God…

 She nodded and touched his next finger.

The LORD alone.

Timothy’s mother was Jewish and his father was Greek. Whether Timothy’s father became a Jewish proselyte or if he was present in the home, is not known. In a letter to Timothy, the apostle Paul mentions his grandmother and mother but not his father or grandfather.  It may have been that Lois, Eunice and Timothy were a family of three when they converted to Christianity through the ministry of Paul in Lystra.

Rembrandt's Timothy and his grandmother, 1648.

Rembrandt’s Timothy and his grandmother, 1648. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Paul credits Eunice and Lois for Timothy’s spiritual foundation (2 Tim. 1:5), which is a significant compliment. Jewish parents highly valued education. They wanted their children to know God and their relationship to Him. Josephus states that the Jews’ “principal care” was “to educate our children well.” It was the “business of life” to “observe the laws…and rules of piety” associated with them.[1] Fathers and mothers were commanded to teach the word of God to their children (Deut. 6:6-8).

What did they teach?

In general terms, Hebrew children were taught “the way of the LORD,” following the commendation God gave Abraham. Abraham taught his children and household to “keep the way of the LORD, to do righteousness and justice” (Gen. 18:19). More specifically, when a child was able to talk, he learned two scriptures—one about God and the other about God’s law  (Deut. 6:4 and Deut. 33:4).[2]

Hear, O Israel, the LORD our God, the LORD alone.

 Moses commanded a law for us, a heritage of the congregation of Jacob.

Following the Hebrew model, Timothy’s mother and grandmother taught him about God, the law and the right way of doing things.

How did they teach?

On the Sabbath and Holy Days Jews heard scripture read in the synagogue. Few families could afford to have their own copy of the law as a reference. Parents depended on memory and experience to teach their children. Children learned by listening to their parents, grandparents and experienced adults.  They repeated what they heard. They memorized scriptures. They asked questions. They practiced telling stories.

Parents taught when they answered questions. “And it shall be, when your children say to you, ‘What do you mean by this service?’ that you shall say, ‘It is the Passover sacrifice of the LORD, who passed over the houses of the children of Israel in Egypt when He struck the Egyptians and delivered our households” (Exodus 12:26-27).

When a child asked a “why” question, an adult answered in context of God’s historical acts. One of the “singular aspects” of Jewish education was to “recognize and remember the Acts and events of divine providence in history.”[3]

In general, parents made ways to teach from morning to evening—drawing attention to lessons at hand (Deut. 6:7).

Why this method?

Hebrew education emphasized the importance of the whole person—mind and body. True knowledge and understanding came from God (Psalm 111:10), and parents based their teaching on that truth. They began the process of instilling wisdom into the minds of their children through discussion, repetition and memorization. The Hebrew model stressed developing a good memory. Without scrolls at home, it was important to store God’s word in the mind. “The worthiest shrine of truths that must not die is the memory and heart of the faithful disciple.”[4]

When boys like Timothy turned seven, they attended synagogue school or studied in the home of a paid teacher. Boys entering synagogue school had already learned the fundamentals of “the way of the LORD.”[5] Additional education prepared a young man to read and discuss the Law. His education built on what he had learned and covered a variety of subjects: agricultural laws and prayers, festival laws, laws concerning marriage and divorce, criminal law, dietary and temple practices and laws about purity.[6]

Eunice and Lois gave Timothy a good spiritual foundation. They taught him the word of God and set the example of living what they believed. Later Timothy became a protégé of Paul and a minister of the Church of God.

Timothy faced challenges and hardships pastoring the church in Ephesus. The comment in Paul’s letter must have encouraged Timothy when he doubted his ability to do the job. “Timothy, you’ve seen real faith in action since you were a child, and now it’s evident in you.”—Mary Hendren

 


[1] Against Apion, Book I, note on 1:12, Flavius Josephus

[2] “Ancient Jewish Education of Children and Use of Scripture,” Blair Kasfeldt, http://suite101.com

[3] “Education in Bible Times, “ Andrew Hill, Baker’s Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology, online

[4] Ibid

[5] Baker’s Evangelical Encyclopedia, “Education in Bible Times,” Andrew Hill

[6] “History of Education in Ancient Israel and Judah,” Wikipedia.

Two wise women

I find two of the most intriguing women who lived during the time of David are known only as “wise women.” While tradition assigns names to the wise men mentioned in Matthew, these individuals are identified only by the cities in which they lived—Tekoa and Abel. One speculation is that there were other such women in the land, and specific identification was of less importance than what they did. This post will concentrate largely on the woman from Tekoa, and incidentally with her counterpart in Abel.

The first encounter

Tragedy and heartache had visited David. His daughter Tamar was raped by her half-brother, Amnon, David’s firstborn son. In an act of passionate vengeance, Absalom (her full brother) murdered the rapist, and then fled his father’s wrath to the safety of his mother’s people in Geshur (2 Samuel 13:37-39). For three years, David mourned for his exiled son.

Joab, David’s nephew and commander of his army, was astute and knew his king well. Unless David reconciled with Absalom, the fate of the monarchial line was at stake. He devised a plan which included a wise woman in Tekoa.

Who is this woman?

Though nameless in the Bible, the fact that Joab knew of her and sought her out indicates she was a familiar figure. Presumably, she enjoyed some reputation in the environs of the area in which she lived.

What made her wise?

Claudia Camp, in her essay, The Wise Women of 2 Samuel,[1] presents a plausible scenario in my opinion. The Book of Proverbs has much to say about wisdom, its value indicated by the abundance of cautions and advice contained within its pages. Proverbs also “gives an indication of a mother’s role in the training of her children, not only as infants and toddlers, but also in the proper attitudes and actions of adult life,” she says. Furthermore, she notes that Proverbs 1:8 and 6:20 speak of the commands and instructions of fathers as a parallel to the law of mothers. Teaching children about life was a joint venture.

In Camp’s view, this woman likely heard axioms concerning wisdom repeatedly during her upbringing. She probably even memorized them and had them emphasized as object lessons at every opportunity. In turn, she passed these on to her own children. As she grew in wisdom from her life experiences, she might also have grown in stature not only in her family, but in her community as well. As others began to seek her counsel, she was gradually regarded as the village wise woman.

Wise women in action 

Both women exhibited some similarities of approach. First, they spoke with confidence and a certain authority (though not officially as a prophet or judge). They both were courageous—one in presenting a total fabrication to her king in order to change his mindset, and the other in effecting the decapitation of the secessionist and rebel, Sheba (2 Samuel 20).

Joab pursues Sheba to the city of Abel.

Joab pursues Sheba to the city of Abel. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Additionally, each woman used a common wisdom device, the utterance of proverbs or sayings (14:14; 20:18). Camp comments, “A saying, then, is employed by a wise person for a particular purpose, possibly to educate another (which always involves some implicit directing as to what is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’) or, as in this case [referring to the wise woman of Abel’s exchange with Joab], to exert influence over another’s action in a way that carries some authority” (pg 198).

“Acts” of persuasion

The wise woman of Tekoa, through her believable performance of a purely fictional scenario, was able to change King David’s perspective enough to bring about reconciliation and preservation of his line of succession. Though Joab had “put words in her mouth” (2 Sam. 14:3)—by essentially giving her a script—she had to draw on her own instincts and “wisdom” as to timing, and method of presentation.

The power of reasoning

On the other hand, the proverb spoken by the woman in Abel informed Joab that to attack the city to get at Sheba would be wrong (2 Sam. 20:18). After all, she reminded him, Abel’s reputation was as a “mother in Israel,” given to counsel, peace, and faithfulness. Perhaps she drew on her store of sayings, learned from her childhood, as she reasoned with this commander bent on assault. Principles such as, “A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger…” (Pro. 15:1) or “by long forbearance a ruler is persuaded, and a gentle tongue breaks a bone” (Pro. 25:15) come to mind. Whatever the case, her wise words carried weight with Joab (he was willing to listen) and the citizens of Abel (they were willing to act). The imminent attack averted, a potential flashpoint for civil war among the tribes of Israel was effectively quenched.

More to learn

These two anonymous women, sought out for their wisdom, positively affected David’s reign. The Bible notes other women who exhibited good judgment and insight. We will meet them in future posts and explore the impact of wisdom in their lives and in the lives of others.

Meanwhile, now might be a good opportunity to review the sayings of the Book of Proverbs. One never knows when she might find herself thrust into the role of a “wise woman.”


[1] Alice Bach, editor, Women from the Hebrew Bible (1999), pg 201

Michal: Part 2

Last week we looked at the life of Michal, David’s first wife. Although the story is a familiar one, I still have some questions. Unfortunately, three of them have no real answers, but, as always, there are many opinions. One question, however, has a fairly complete explanation, so I will begin with it.

QWhat is a teraphim?

A.  In 1 Samuel 19:13, the text says, “And Michal took an image and laid it in the bed, put a cover of goats’ hair for his head, and covered it with clothes.” The word for “image” in Hebrew is teraphim. All sources consulted agree this was a household god:

  • “…’the teraphim,’ of the figure and size of the human form, used for superstitious purposes by the Israelites in the times of the judges and of Saul (Judg 17:5), until the practice was suppressed by Josiah (2 Kings 23:24). They were considered the givers and guardians of life and property, or consulted as oracles (Zech 10:2; Hos 3:4).”[1]
  • “the teraphim…in all probability an image of the household gods of the size of life, and, judging from what follows, in human form….”[2]
  • “‘Teraphim’… an image, or bust in human form, and as large as life, of a kind of household god, to the worship of which the Israelites, and especially women, were much addicted.”[3]

However, The Expositor’s Bible Commentary poses an alternate explanation: “Since terephim is always plural, and since the idols they denote are presumably always small…the dummy was almost certainly not a single, man-sized idol. Michal’s ruse was probably effected by piling clothing, carpets, or the like on David’s bed and covering it with a garment, allowing only the goats’ hair head to show.”[4] 

Teraphim 4

Teraphim 4 (Photo credit: michaelz1)

Q. Why would such a figure have been in Michal’s room in the first place?

 A.  Expositor’s commentary notes that Michal’s use of household idols “doubtless reflects pagan inclination or ignorance on her part.” Further, it compares Michal’s deception with Rachel’s, when she, too, deceived her father, Laban, with teraphim. Each woman demonstrated more devotion to her husband than to her father.[5]

If it were due to a “pagan inclination,” could this partially explain her reaction when she saw David’s dance as something repugnant? There is no record of Michal exhibiting any particular reverence for David’s God, and Israel itself had a long history of flirting with idolatry. David trusted in God, we know. What we do not know is whether Michal trusted in teraphim. The Bible is silent in this regard.

Q. What was Michal’s fate?

A.  It is difficult to resist the temptation to fill in the blanks where the Bible is silent, especially when studying such a fascinating character as Michal. Following are various attempts to flesh out the scant details we do have.

Some wonder if David put Michal in a sort of confinement as he did in 2 Samuel 20:3: “Now David came to his house at Jerusalem. And the king took the ten women, his concubines whom he left to keep the house, and put them in seclusion and supported them, but did not go in to them. So they were shut up to the day of their death, living in widowhood.”

Edith Deen notices a rather conflicting passage in 2 Samuel 21:8 in which five sons of Michal are mentioned: “Scholars seem to be convinced that this is a scribal error, that these were not Michal’s sons but the sons of her sister Merab, and that she reared them as her own after her sister’s death.”[6] She does not express her personal opinion. Others, such as Sue and Larry Richards,[7] seem confident that Michal remained in David’s house as a symbol, that he never touched her again, and she died childless and alone.

At least one other ponders a different facet of her story—the reason behind such a fate. Professor Robert Alter of U.C. Berkeley asks, “Is this a punishment from God, or simply a refusal by David to share her bed, or is the latter to be understood as the agency for the former?”[8]

As you can see, opinions and questions are plentiful, but all the Bible will say on the matter is found in 2 Samuel 6:23: “Therefore Michal the daughter of Saul had no children unto the day of her death.”

Q. Did David love Michal?

A.  I Samuel 18:20 states, “Now Michal, Saul’s daughter, loved David.” In fact, this is the only place in the Hebrew Bible where it is stated that a woman loves a man.[9] No place does it say that David loved Michal.

Most authorities address the obvious. Michal was a pawn in her father’s hand. Saul offered her in marriage for one reason—he hoped that her bride price would result in David’s death. It was purely a matter of retaining power.

Michal, however, was looking through a different set of lenses. David was a familiar personality in the royal household. He was young. She was young. It would be logical to assume that she held at least some physical attraction for David. He definitely did for her.

After they were married, Michal defied her father by helping David escape Saul’s murderous intent. No Bible record indicates that David ever tried to contact her afterwards, or come back for her. But there are accounts that he managed to meet with her brother Jonathan on at least two occasions.

Both were thrust into new roles—he as a fugitive; she, by her father’s intervention, as another man’s wife. David took other wives, and then concubines. Years passed, and children were born. When he finally returned years later, David came as a king, replete with a royal entourage and harem.

He called for Michal once more. There is no mention of celebration or jubilation as might be expected after such a long separation. Scholars view this as a shrewd political move to assure David’s bid for the throne of a united monarchy. He just needed Saul’s daughter to help him seal the deal.

So did David love Michal? Perhaps, at least in the beginning, one would hope. However, accounts of true and lasting marital love are scarce in the pages of the Bible, especially among the households of the Royals. Politics, not love, always seem to reign supreme.

The story of Michal continues to be a fascinating one. With each reading I discover new questions and curiosities which keep me coming back for more.


[1] From Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown Commentary, Electronic Database. Copyright © 1997, 2003 by Biblesoft, Inc.

[2] Keil and Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament: New Updated Edition, Electronic Database. Copyright © 1996 by Hendrickson Publishers, Inc.

[3] Barnes’ Notes, Electronic Database Copyright © 1997, 2003 by Biblesoft, Inc.

[4](1992 edition)  Volume 3, page 716.

[5] See Genesis 31:33-35.

[6] All the Women of the Bible (1955), page 100

[7] Every Woman in the Bible (1999),  p 115

[8] The David Story (1999), page 230

[9] Women in Scripture (2000), Carol Meyers, Gen. Ed., page 126

Coming next week: Michal, Part 2, and two wise women

If you are like me, you probably found that the account of Michal and David poses some interesting questions. Did David love her? What is a teraphim, and why did Michal have one in her room? What was her fate? Next week we’ll complete her story, and  move on to the last personalities in our series, the mysterious wise women of Tekoa and Abel.

English: "Make them known unto thy childr...

English: “Make them known unto thy children and thy children’s children.” Deuteronomy 4:9. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

And then…what better way to start a new year than with a focus on education?

Education has always been a concern for parents—whether it be in the form of teaching a trade or skill in order to make a living, mentoring in areas of responsibility and decision-making, or, most importantly, instilling principles for living a successful, moral life.

The Bible gives guidelines for teaching children, particularly about God, and defines appropriate conduct. It also furnishes examples. We’ll visit two New Testament women who joined forces to provide a quality education for a boy they both loved. Their names are Lois and Eunice.

Thanks for stopping by!

Rizpah

For anyone outside the king’s court to see Rizpah was rare. Closely protected by eunuchs, she was a royal concubine and lived in separate quarters. She belonged to King Saul and may have been his only concubine. Her story begins, “Now Saul had a concubine named Rizpah daughter of Aiah” and continues with the reason she was out in public (2 Samuel 3:7, 21:10-14).

A mother’s vigil

After Saul died, Rizpah became part of King David’s harem. In the normal course of events, Rizpah would have lived in the seclusion of his court. But Gibeonites had killed the two sons she had borne to Saul and impaled them on a hilltop for public scrutiny. There they hung as restitution for something they hadn’t done. Rizpah watched over them.

Painting of a Biblical scene

Painting of a Biblical scene (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Rizpah…took sackcloth and spread it out for herself on a rock. From the beginning of the harvest till the rain poured down from the heavens on the bodies, she did not let the birds of the air touch them by day or the wild animals by night.

Sackcloth symbolized mourning and penance (Gen. 37:34). Considering her gruesome vigil, I wonder if Rizpah could have had any thoughts of some greater purpose being worked out through her slain sons? Her sad efforts to defend the dead from scavengers would have been enough thought.

The backstory

Some years before, King Saul had gone after Canaanite tribes northwest of Jerusalem. Among the people he killed were Gibeonites. Putting to death any Gibeonites violated a treaty of protection Joshua had made with them four hundred years earlier. Because Saul broke the treaty Joshua had made, he triggered divine punishment—a three-year famine that commenced in the reign of David. As the famine intensified, David inquired of the LORD about the meaning of it (2 Samuel 21:1).

It is because of Saul and his bloodthirsty house, because he killed the Gibeonites.

Atonement

When David learned that the famine resulted from a broken treaty, he asked the Gibeonites what he could do to atone for Saul’s infraction.  To settle accounts, they required that seven of Saul’s sons be turned over to them for execution and public exposure. David agreed and handed over five sons of Merob (Saul’s daughter) and the two sons of Rizpah.

Did God approve of the Gibeonites’ request and David’s handling of the matter? Commentators disagree. Noted Bible scholar Herbert Lockyer states, “Vengeance was taken out of God’s hands and executed by revengeful men in God’s name on seven innocent men.”[1] Adam Clarke states, “It is very strange that a choice of this kind should be left to such people. Why not ask this of God himself?”[2]

The Expositor’s commentary states that because “the famine was due to the breaking of the covenant between Gibeon and Israel…propitiation could only be effected by the death of the sons of Saul at the hands of the Gibeonites.”[3] Other commentators conclude that because the rains commenced, God was satisfied.

How long?

How long did Rizpah remain on watch? The Expositor’s Commentary says she stayed until the rains came that ended the drought, and these rains “were probably an unseasonable late-spring or early summer shower.”[4] Josephus states, “So when the Gibeonites had received the men, they punished them as they pleased; upon which God began to send rain.” [5] However, the Bible does not say that God brought an immediate rain, a late spring rain or an early summer rain. Edersheim believes the rains were the periodic ones that began in October, meaning that Rizpah continued her sad duties for five months.[6]

A proper burial

When David was told about what Rizpah had done, he was moved to bring back the bones of Saul and Jonathan from where they had been buried in Jabesh Gilead. He took the bones of the seven sons from the hill and buried them with Saul and Jonathon in tomb of Kish, Saul’s father. What happened to Rizpah after the interment is not known. Perhaps she was comforted that Saul and his sons had a decent burial.

Did God approve?

A post-script to her tragic story is the question of whether God approved of concubines and multiple wives. Many notable men had several wives and/or concubines (Abraham, Jacob, Gideon, Saul, David, Solomon). Jesus said that from the beginning of creation, marriage was an institution uniting one man and one woman (Matt.19:4-5, Gen.1:27, 2:21-24). Because people strayed from God’s pattern, by the time of Abraham having another wife or a concubine was not considered “evil.” Taking additional wives and concubines became a “regular custom among the Jews” so some of the laws God gave Moses for Israel “were directed to prevent excess and abuse”[7] of the practice. The allowances made for divorce, multiple marriages and concubines are laws and procedures made necessary because men have departed from God’s will.

Life as a concubine

Royal concubines were kept under close supervision and enjoyed privileges in food, clothing, and living quarters. They entered a king’s harem through a political alliance, from the slave market or as a requisition from among the beautiful women in the kingdom. Customarily they were well cared for because they added to a king’s prestige. A Queen Mother or head eunuch managed the harem and each concubine’s access to the king. The wives and concubines of a king that died or was deposed became the property of his successor.♦ Mary Hendren

.


[1] All the Women of the Bible, Herbert Lockyer, p. 143.

[2] Adam Clarke’s Commentary, One-Volume Edition, p. 333.

[3] The Expositor’s Bible Commentary, Vol. 3, p.1054

[4] Ibid, p.1055

[5] An Exposition of the Old and New Testament, by John Gill, online, note on v.10

[6] Bible History Old Testament, Alfred Edersheim, p. 570.

[7] The New Unger’s Bible Dictionary,  “Concubine,” pp. 250-251